An
Appeal to Civil Society:
An
appeal to the People’s Movement II to continue with
active campaign of Civil Society, Human Rights
Activists, Lawyers, Journalists, Intellectuals,
&Youths of Nepal to establish a Decentralized
Electoral (Federal) System of Government:
The
leaders of political parties of Nepal are prone to get
succumb to their parties’ self-interest for power.
Once they get into the government their minds get lost
even at this critical stage of national crises –
“so much for just forming a cabinet to pave the road
for Interim Government to perform the election of
National Assembly!”
|
There should be no appointees from the central
government to administer the local body of the
government.
Rather
with the recommendation of the local government the
central government will establish its agencies’
services on Education, Population, Agriculture,
Industries, Transports etc.
The
district Public Commission agency should provide the
human resources for the managements of local
government as per local government’s recommendation.
The
New Constitution must make clear that the electoral
members of the district assembly and chairperson, and
electoral members of municipality assembly and mayor
and members of village assembly and mayor must
administer the local bodies of the government.
|
|
Nepali
people have let them do this in the past. But now at
this juncture we must be actively vigilant to guard
the verdict of the People’s Movement II getting
slipped away from the political party leaders’
wicked hands.
Until
we successfully accomplish the foundation of the
complete democracy through the election of the
Constituent Assembly – for Republican or ceremonial
monarchical Multiparty Democracy, we must not put an
end to the People’s Movement II. We must keep moving
on with it until we reach to our destination.
|
But
it must be unconstitutional for the central government
appointees to rule the local bodies of government. If
the New Constitution did not abolish such logistics of
oligarchic governance then that will be utter
violation of fundamental rights of people of Nepal to
have right and responsibility to rule themselves.
The
electoral members of National Constituent Assembly
must define the off-limits of the central government
in the New Constitution precisely and thereby let
people put their houses together themselves in their
own home districts, municipalities and villages.
|
|
People’s
movement II have warned the political leaders of all
party that they must not repeat the same mistakes
again as they had committed in last fifteen years.
One
of the mistakes that leaders kept committing was their
inability to find the common denominator to resolved
the national crises. Instead they strived for their
own self-interest.
To
this juncture we ‘Nepali people’ owe our deep
respect to the members of civil society, human rights
activists, journalists, lawyers and youth
organizations who have united us to fight the cause
not only in Nepal but global wise.
|
Party
leaders must have observed the significance of the
local governance from the successful example of the
Community Forest managements that took place in last
twelve years’ democracy in Nepal!
Legislators
and party leaders must advocate abolishing such an
oligarchic central government’s appointment of CDO
to administer districts of Nepali.
This
will also eliminate the chances for political leaders
to manipulate CDOS for their own political
self-interest.
In most
of democratic countries the law enforcement logistics
are established from the local level of government. |
|
Now
we have found the common denominator “The Election
Of The Constituent Assembly”.
We must therefore most precisely and vigilantly
establish the secular Democratic legislature,
executive and judiciary logistics to abolish feudal
autocratic and oligarchic governing systems, which are
creeping viruses in the government agencies.
In
my humble appeal to you all I would like to remind you
that the oligarchic administrative logistics are
dominant elements of feudal autocratic regime. They
are not only corrupt but also parasitical in the
government practice.
|
The
‘county’ village law enforcement officer
‘sheriff’, municipality and district enforcement
officers must be the permanent residence (from 6
months to 2 years’ residency) of the (state)
district.
In
general election they are in the ballot with rest of
the candidates. There’s
no central government appointee for the law
enforcement officer or police.
1.
Abolish therefore ‘DSP, SSP, ISP’ law
enforcement officers or police officers as appointees
of the central government logistics.
The
district, municipality chief law enforcement officer
(police officer) and village sheriff
|
Therefore,
we all members of Civil Society, Human Rights
Activists, Lawyers, Journalists, Intellectuals,
&Youths of Nepal must campaign to abolish such
logistics and bring about changes in the ‘New Constitution of
People of Nepal’ that gives fundamental rights and
responsibility to the people to be governed by
themselves.
|
(village
chief law enforcement officer) must be the permanent
resident of the district, municipality and the village
and they must be in the ballot of every general
election.
There
should be police academy in every district from where
the police forces are trained and supply to demand of
the district, municipality and village. Provided
members of police forces are the permanent resident of
the district.
|
|
I
hope you will not hesitate to agree with me to abolish
following oligarchic logistics of the autocratic
government:
1.
Abolish ‘Chief District Officer’ as central
government’s appointee to administer the districts
of Nepal. This is an oligarchic logistic began from
Rana regime. If in Democracy people are to rule
themselves through electoral process from the
grassroots of government practice, how can a central
government appointee from Bhojpur run the district
administration of Doti? Such practice from the government must be fundamentally and
radically abolished in our “New Democratic
Constitution.”
We must campaign therefore to establish an
autonomous district level government in our New
Democratic Constitution.
As
in most democratic countries’ government practice,
the elected (state) district chairman or governor must
run the district administration by forming a district
cabinet from among the elected district assembly
members in majority or collision just as in the
federal or central government cabinet.
But
any system of government that has central
government’s appointee such as CDO that administers
the state or district violates the fundamental rights
and responsibility of people.
In
last twelve years of multiparty system of government
CDOS gave no place for the elected members of district
assembly and district chair to legislate and
administer the district. Instead few members became
rebel and most of them remain puppets of CDOS to
exploit the development budgets for their
self-interest.
Thus
CDOS had brought corruptions and injustice in the
administration and development of the districts of
Nepal.
We
must campaign for New Democratic Constitution that can
clearly define the off-limits of the Central
Government:
The
work of federal government is to formulate
administrative policies to execute the legislations of
the Parliament for the domestic and international
relations with the broader national interest.
The
New Constitution must secure independence of the local
government to form its own cabinet with the district
chair or governor.
The
constitution must assure the district as autonomous
government so it can formulate its own specific
district government logistics and policies through the
legislature of the local assembly.
For
instant, the local government must have policy to
collect local tax such as property tax, local wages
tax, local sales tax, local income tax etc as its
revenue.
|
The
New Constitution must not allow central government to
appoint a law enforcement officer from the district of
Bhojpur to police the district of Jumla.
Otherwise this will be the violation of the
fundamental rights of people of Nepal to choose to
rule themselves.
Similarly
in most of the democratic governments, except for the
Supreme Court Justices all other district judges and
attorneys are in the ballot of the general election
and they must be the resident of the (state) district.
1.
Abolish the appointment of district attorney
and district Judge. They too must be permanent
resident of the district and must be put in the
ballots of every general election.
Local
governments resource management:
The
New Constitution must define article for local
governments resource management for water supply,
sanitation, health and education.
For
instance, how education system should be managed in
grassroots level.
There
must be election for members of the council of
education in every village school district, and
municipality school district. For example, Kathmandu
municipality might have at list a hundred school
districts.
The
elected school district members of council should be
responsible for each school district’s education
that meets national standard. The members should also
be in the ballots in every general election.
Civil
Society, Human Rights activists, lawyers, journalists,
intellectuals, and youths must stand vigilantly to
make sure the New Constitution must abolish the
central government’s oligarchic control of the
governance of the districts of Nepal.
It
must rather assure clearly the establishment
provisions for the autonomous local government’s
logistics. Thereby
the citizens of each district from different walks of
life must be given their fundamental rights and
responsibility to govern their own district through
the process of general election.
We
all should look and find the creeping parasites of
oligarchic logistics in the domain of government
practice that had and will violate the fundamental
rights and responsibility of people. Then and there we
must campaign against it to abolish from the
government practice.
This should be our culture of complete
Democracy to never back off from standing for our
right and responsibility.
Anon Liberty
anon.ncs@gmail.com
May 1, 2006
|