|
The
appointments of the secretaries in the government
agencies or departments or ministries and
semi-government corporate chiefs must go through
complete democratic procedures.
For
example, how the appointments of Supreme Court judges
and attorney general are processed normally in a
democratic nation as follow:
First
candidates are nominated by the cabinet or the
government to bring to the Parliament for hearing.
After
both lower and upper house hearings of the Parliament
are done with voting in the both house for the
appointment then only Supreme Court judges and the
attorney general are appointed in the post.
Such
complete democratic procedure must be applied to all
government appointments. We cannot practice the way
the present government of seven parties appointed the
corporate chiefs and promoted the secretaries of
ministries. Such arbitrary appointments are the
continuation of the practice of the feudal oligarchic
and autocratic logistics. Such arbitrary actions of
the present government are against the spirit of the
people’s movements – this is what people want to
end it.
Like
wise in the hearings of Parliaments the members of
Parliament must thoroughly and honestly investigate
the nominees' bio-data and personal background in
terms of their affiliations to political party,
ideology, finance transactions and religion to make
sure that he or she can do the job properly and
impartially to serve the people with respect to the
constitution of Nepal.
This
means abolition of the centrally controlled government
logistics of old regimes - feudal oligarchic and
military autocratic governments’ establishments.
In
order to restructure the nation the elected district
chiefs or governors and district assembly members’
cabinet must administer the districts of Nepal. But
the appointment of the district chief administration
officer by the central government to administer the
district must be unconstitutional.
Similarly,
except for the Supreme Court judges and Attorney
General all other judges such as district judges,
attorneys and district law enforcement officer
(police) must be in the general election ballot to be
elected by the popular votes of the people of Nepal.
It
is democratic practice to establish law enforcement
logistics or policing from grass-root local level. In
Nepal we can start from district level through general
election ballot. Each district must establish district
level of police academy for police personnel
appointments and training. From such police
professionals a district law enforcement officer must
be elected by the popular votes of the people of each
district.
In
federal system of democratic government there should
only be district law enforcement chief in seventy-five
districts with the mandatory following regulations:
District
police chief and police personnel must be the
permanent resident of the district.
No
law enforcement personnel can be diploid in a district
with the residency of other district such as sending a
police personnel from Kathmandu to run Jumla.
There
should never be national law enforcement (police)
chiefs such SP, ISP, SSP and so on to control
centrally the law enforcement personnel in the whole
nation.
In
democratic practice there must be district level of
law enforcement practice and responsibility on the
part of law enforcement agency such as police force to
keep the law and order within the district level.
The
national intelligence agency must be established under
the supervision of the attorney general as federal
intelligence agency to monitor national law
enforcement regulations. All the national police
chiefs we have piled in Kathmandu can work as
intelligence officers to eliminate the national police
chief positions.
At
this point we do not know whether we can bring such
deep change in the government practice because many of
us especially the politicians may not be experienced
to vision such changes. But I think the
decentralizations of the administration to the
district level; judiciary and law enforcement to the
district level will control the uncontrollable
national corruptions and might help generate local
revenues.
But
if we only cry for the complete democracy but we fail
to bring such scrupulous detail oriented changes in
the government practice then I guess we will have same
political and development scenarios as we have had
with present government and the previous governments
that functioned with centrally controlled mechanism of
the feudal oligarchic logistics.
If
we are serious for changes to bring about complete
democracy then I think we cannot obviously continue
with the government practices of the old regimes or
establish a Biharian and Upean style of democracy of
northern India. |